Virendra Swaroop Srivastava Son vs. Vaishya Brothers And Co. (P) Ltd. on 20 December, 2007

  The governmental construction Company, established of which used to carry on work of construction of buildings and plants on contract. The workman had been appointed as Foreman (Head Mistri) by employer for work on permanent basis for working at Raipur. After interview on a consolidated salary of Rs. 1800/-; and workman was posted for working on Dehradun-Raipur site by the employer. But employer had not given any appointment letter to the workman. Workman was directed to submit his joining at the Head Office at Kanpur, and in compliance the workman joined at the Head Office of the establishment of the employer at Kanpur and continued to get his presence recorded at the Head Office. Workman was engaged on temporary basis for working at Dehradun-Raipur site, and on completion of the work, full and final payment was made to the workman.The Director of the Establishment orally removed the workman from the work.
  The Award the Labour Court held that the removal/deprivation of the petitioner workman was improper and illegal.  It was not on the basis of principles of natural justice.  Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner, interalia.
  The writ Petition is allowed. The impugned order writ Petition passed by the Labour Court is quashed. The circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to Costs. U.P. industrial Disputes Act, 1947.