Madan Gopal Kakkad vs. Naval Dubey on 29 April, 1992

Whether the IPC section 376 is a bailable offence

  The accused who just then graduated from the Medical College was staying with the family consisting of his parents, his brothers, his sister-in-law Smt. Tara Dubey and niece Richa Dubey, who is the daughter of the accused's step-brother Niraj Dubey, in Adarsh Nagar, Jabalpur. His father Bhagwan Dass Dubey was a retired Professor and his sister-in-law Tara Dubey was a lecturer. His elder brother at the relevant time of this occurrence was working as Superintendent of Police in Rajgarh District. Opposite to his house at some distance Satish Bhasin and Sapna Bhasin were residing with their minor daughter Priti. Within the same locality 3 or 4 houses away from the house of the accused, the appellant Madan Gopal Kakad was living with his wife, a German lady, by name, Elesabeth Kakad his sister Veera and his minor daughter Tulna Sheri a girl aged about 8 years and his younger son Pulkit. The family members of the accused and Madan Gopal Kakad were on cordial relationship making frequent visits to the houses of each other.

Section 376 IPC

  Tulna Sheri the unfortunate victim in this case was studying in the third standard in St. Joseph Convent along with her class-mate Richa Dubey. Tulna used to come frequently to the house of the accused to play with Richa Dubey and her other girl friends. Tarun Lata Joshi was living with her father who was a tenant in the house of Madan Gopal Kakad.The accused who had a crush on young girls used to develop friendship with the girls who used to come to his house to play with his niece Richa Dubey by narrating interesting stories from comic books. On the day of this deplorable incident, Richa Dubey called Tulna.

Section 376 IPC: Once it is established that victim offered no ...

  Tulna wearing underwear and jeans accompanied by her younger brother Pulkit went to the house of Richa, but found none except the accused. The accused found fault with Tulna for having come there in jeans accompanied by her brother. When the two girls, namely, Tulna and Richa started playing in the drawing room, the accused whispered something in the ears of Richa, who then told Tulna that she had been asked by her uncle (the accused) to take Pulkit outside and narrate him some stories and that the accused would `make love', presumably meaning that he would tell some lurid tales of sex to her thereby stimulating immoral thoughts so that Tulna might fall a prey to his lewd and lascivious behaviour. As soon as Richa went outside taking Pulkit, the accused bolted the door from inside, completely stripped off himself; removed the jeans and underwear of Tulna and made her naked and asked Tulna to do fellatio, that is to suck his penis. Thereafter the accused cuddled and pined Tulna close to him, and slightly inserted his penis into her vulva and started sucking her lips. Within a few seconds, he ejaculated and freed the girl from his clutches and thereafter put on his pyjamas and asked Tulna to wear her jeans. Again the accused longing for his lascivious passion, laid down Tulna on a sofa in his drawing room and remained lying on her and closed her mouth so that the girl could not scream. A little later after wetting his sexual appetite he got up; opened the door allowed the girl to go out. While the girl was leaving the drawing hall, the accused threatened her not to disclose his affair to anyone, otherwise his elder brother who is a high ranking police office would mercilessly beat her parents. Tulna came out of the room and told Richa as to what all happened inside the room.

  The decision of the Court gravity of this repugnant crime of rape perpetrated on Tulna Sheri who was then 8 years old on the date of the offence in 1982, while convicting the accused under Section 376 IPC sentence him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 25,000 in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1-1/2 years.


0/Post a Comment/Comments