Manager vs. Pradipkumar on 13 May, 2010


Pradipkumar Shantilal Shah was workman in the Vardhaman Co-operative Bank Ltd. In that bank workman was working as a Peon since 1985. The Manager bank is governed by the provisions of Bombay industrial Relations Act, 1946. Workman was dismissed from service on by petitioner Bank. His service was terminated because of loss of confidence. At the time of termination one month's notice pay was paid of Rs.9101/- to the concerned workman. This order of termination was challenged by workman before Labour Court, Baroda.

Labour Court has granted reinstatement with 35% back wages of interim period the order passed by Industrial Court, Baroda. When a case of dismissal or discharge of an employee is referred for industrial adjudication the labour court should first decide as a preliminary issue whether the domestic enquiry has violated the principles of natural justice. When there is no domestic enquiry or defective. The Manager of Vardhman Co-operative Bank Ltd. has challenged order passed by Labour Court, Baroda.

The Gujarat High Court held that Labour Court confirmed by Industrial Court is perfectly justified and no interference is required by this Court while exercising powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence, there is no substance in present petition. Accordingly, present petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated. The Manager of  bank implement the order of the Labour Court as early as possible within a period of one month from date of receiving copy of present order.