Dr. A.N. Mukerji vs State of Bengal on 5 January, 1968


     Smt. Harbans Kaur was born in a Sikh family at Sialkot. In the year 1921 at the age of 11 or 12 years she was married to Sujan Singh a Sikh by faith in the Anand form which is an approved form of marriage amongst the Sikhs.  Sujan Singh brought his wife who was a shy and innocent girl observing Pardah to live with him. Sujan Singh was posted at various stations in Assam where the husband and wife lived happily and had four children. Smt. Harbans Kaur started getting pain in her abdomen and on the suggestion of a lady friend she went to Calcutta to get treatment from the accused who had recently returned from England after obtaining double F. R. C. S. from two British Universities. Sujan Singh could not accompany her. She met the accused who treated her and when her pain had subsided she came back to Mymensingh where her husband was posted and told him that the doctor had advised her to come to Calcutta for further treatment. Sujan Singh accordingly took six month's leave and went with his wife and children to Calcutta in the first week of December, 1939, and stayed there at 3 Store Road. On their arrival their daughter Sheela got typhoid and was treated by the accused. When She was better he started the treatment of the complainant.
     The accused became very friendly with Sujan Singh and 'his wife. He used to come not only for professional visits but also for friendly and social contacts and often took his lunch, tea and dinner with them. The frequent visits to such social gatherings in hotels and clubs had a tremendous effect on the unsophisticated mind of the prosecutrix who began to take a wide interest in them. The accused evinced unusual interest in the complainant and started admiring her on frequent occasions and thus became friendly with her. One day in January the complainant also developed a liking for the accused who expressed to her on some occasions that he was madly in love with her. In fact the accused started taking liberties with her but she did not allow him to go beyond certain limits.
     Sujan Singh left for Jamshedpur. The accused took him and the complainant in his car to Howrah Rly. Station. When the train had left with Sujan Singh the accused and the complainant returned. She was sitting by the side "of the accused who was himself driving the car. In the car the accused told her that he wanted to marry her. She took it as a joke and asked as to how he could marry her when she was already married. The accused narrated to her the stories of Draupadi and Shakuntala from the Hindu epics and told her that a Hindu woman can marry more than one husband. He explained to her that he wanted to marry her in the Gandharva form as King Dushyant had married Shakuntala. The complainant believed the representations of the accused and agreed to such marriage without understanding its significance. The accused then drove to Dhakuria Lakes in South Calcutta and after parking the car both of them came out and faced the moon. He married with Harbans. She was induced to believe that it was a valid marriage and the accused, who had become her husband, had every right on her.  Sujan Singh was recalled to duty in Assam. The children also went back to Shillong. The complainant did not disclose her marriage to her husband Sujan Singh as the accused had taken a promise from her that she would not do so as one day he himself would inform Sujan Singh. During the aforesaid, period the complainant's former husband used to remain most of the time outside on duty and even when the complainant went and lived with him or he came and lived with her at Calcutta she used to have a separate bed and did not allow him to have marital relations with her. Beginning of May, 1948, she conceived from the accused. In order to cover up the pregnancy, she called Sujan Singh from Assam.
    The accused treated the complainant with cruelty and occasionally tortured her. But whenever she went out of Calcutta to Mussoorie and other stations he entreated her to return. But on her return, she was subjected to the same cycle of ill-treatment and then cajolery. Sujan Singh then came to know that his wife was living in adultery with the accused.  Sujan Singh filed a petition in the High Court of Calcutta for the dissolution of his marriage with the complainant  and obtained an ex parte decree against her on the ground of her adultery with the accused. After the dissolution of her marriage with Sujan Singh the accused refused, to marry her and cut off his connections completely. she filed the present complaint. 
  The Court held that Dr. Amar Nath Mukerji against his conviction and sentence of one year's rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 75,000/- under Section 417 I. P. C. and Smt. Harbans Kaur the prosecutrix, against his acquittal of charges under Sections 493 and 376 I. P. C. Dr. Amar Nath Mukerji debarred from practice as a medical practitioner for a period of three years quashed.