Bank of India vs Surendra Kumar Mishra on 16 May, 2002

    Mishra, a Taxi Driver approached Bank of India. Ranchi Branch, for giving him loan for purchasing a new ambassador Car for plying as taxi. The Bank agreed to advance loan on certain terms and conditions, which were accepted by him.  Mishra, thereafter executed a promissory note for Rs. 16,000/-on 9/6/1972 promising to repay the loan with interest @ 4% per annum over Reserve Bank of India rate, subject to minimum of 9% per annum.


Retired GM, DGM Of Bank Of India Arrested By CBI In Rs 2654-Crore ...

    Raj Kishore Lal and Baikunth Mishra executed letters of guarantee simultaneously on 9.6.1972 itself. On 1.6.1976, Mishra, the principal-debtor acknowledged in writing to pay the total dues outstanding against him, but failed to liquidate the dues. Hence, Bank of India, filed Money Suit No. 105 of 1978 for a decree of Rs. 20,461.91 paise with interest pendente lite on future @ 11% per annum, Mishra, the principal-debtor was impleaded as Mishra and Raj Kishore Lal and Baikunth Mishra the two guarantors were  made in suit.

     Mishra and Raj Kishor Lal  inspite of valid set i.e. of summons, failed to appear and contest the suit. Baikunth Mishra appeared, filed written statement and contested the suit. He admitted himself to be one of sureties for Mishra in respect of original agreement entered on 9.6.1972. He pleaded about aforesaid acknowledgment dated 1.6.1976 and prayed to dismiss the suit as against him. Plaintiff-bank has, therefore, filed the present appeal.

 In the result, this appeal is allowed and impugned judgment and decree are modified to the extent that suit is also decreed oh contest as against Raj Kishor Lal and ex parts as against Baikunth Mishra no cost. An authority is established by the condition referred to above and the guarantor is also bound by the aforesaid acknowledgment of the principal debtor and, therefore, the suit was not barred.


0/Post a Comment/Comments